<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Everyday International Law &#187; Diplomacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everydayinternationallaw.com/tag/diplomacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everydayinternationallaw.com</link>
	<description>Where current events and International Law collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Updates for 2009-05-20</title>
		<link>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/05/20/twitter-updates-for-2009-05-20/</link>
		<comments>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/05/20/twitter-updates-for-2009-05-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Lenon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/05/20/twitter-updates-for-2009-05-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right wing fears State Dept. legal adviser&#8217;s correct view to use transnational approach w/ international law in cases. http://bit.ly/JGwDS # To clarify, the previous article quotes Koh saying consider international law AFTER constitutional issues. The author ignores that point. # Under U.S. law, ratified treaties are equal to laws depending on their chronology and scope. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>Right wing fears State Dept. legal adviser&#8217;s correct view to use transnational approach w/ international law in cases. <a rel="nofollow" href="http://bit.ly/JGwDS">http://bit.ly/JGwDS</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EILBlog/statuses/1861041075">#</a></li>
<li>To clarify, the previous article quotes Koh saying consider international law AFTER constitutional issues.  The author ignores that point. <a href="http://twitter.com/EILBlog/statuses/1862313221">#</a></li>
<li>Under U.S. law, ratified treaties are equal to laws depending on their chronology and scope.  Both are subordinate to Constitution. <a href="http://twitter.com/EILBlog/statuses/1862337375">#</a></li>
<li>Venezuela&#8217;s influence wanes with falling oil prices.  Other nations moving in.  Opportunity for the U.S. <a rel="nofollow" href="http://bit.ly/Jjx2D">http://bit.ly/Jjx2D</a> (NY Times) <a href="http://twitter.com/EILBlog/statuses/1862555511">#</a></li>
</ul>
<p class="aktt_credit">Powered by <a href="http://alexking.org/projects/wordpress">Twitter Tools</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/05/20/twitter-updates-for-2009-05-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Updates for 2009-05-06</title>
		<link>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/05/06/twitter-updates-for-2009-05-06/</link>
		<comments>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/05/06/twitter-updates-for-2009-05-06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Lenon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/05/06/twitter-updates-for-2009-05-06/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russia expels 2 Canadian diplomats over #NATO espionage charges. Will this effect CDN/EU trade talks? http://bit.ly/9zhJ9 (AP) # Powered by Twitter Tools.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>Russia expels 2 Canadian diplomats over #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23NATO">NATO</a> espionage charges. Will this effect CDN/EU trade talks? <a rel="nofollow" href="http://bit.ly/9zhJ9">http://bit.ly/9zhJ9</a> (AP) <a href="http://twitter.com/EILBlog/statuses/1717225577">#</a></li>
</ul>
<p class="aktt_credit">Powered by <a href="http://alexking.org/projects/wordpress">Twitter Tools</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/05/06/twitter-updates-for-2009-05-06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Updates for 2009-04-30</title>
		<link>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/04/30/twitter-updates-for-2009-04-30/</link>
		<comments>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/04/30/twitter-updates-for-2009-04-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Lenon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/04/30/twitter-updates-for-2009-04-30/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada / EU trade talk seen to pressure Doha Round holdouts. Seal products are a stumbling block. http://bit.ly/16Rc2s (Globe &#38; Mail) # #NATO expels 2 Russian diplomats for alleged espionage. Only a month after normalizing relations following Georgian War. http://bit.ly/QWOFH # Powered by Twitter Tools.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul class="aktt_tweet_digest">
<li>Canada / EU trade talk seen to pressure Doha Round holdouts.  Seal products are a stumbling block.  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://bit.ly/16Rc2s">http://bit.ly/16Rc2s</a> (Globe &amp; Mail) <a href="http://twitter.com/EILBlog/statuses/1659594966">#</a></li>
<li>#<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23NATO">NATO</a> expels 2 Russian diplomats for alleged espionage. Only a month after normalizing relations following Georgian War. <a rel="nofollow" href="http://bit.ly/QWOFH">http://bit.ly/QWOFH</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/EILBlog/statuses/1660212997">#</a></li>
</ul>
<p class="aktt_credit">Powered by <a href="http://alexking.org/projects/wordpress">Twitter Tools</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/04/30/twitter-updates-for-2009-04-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Diplomacy Losing Power</title>
		<link>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/02/03/us-diplomacy-losing-power/</link>
		<comments>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/02/03/us-diplomacy-losing-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Lenon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayinternationallaw.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bolivia has the largest proven deposits of lithium in the world. Almost half of the known lithium volume in the world is found in Bolivia. Lithium is crucial in manufacturing batteries that are effective in electric cars. In order to break our addiction from polluting, rapidly depleting oil, large amounts of lithium is needed. Bolivia [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolivia has the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/03/world/americas/03lithium.html?partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">largest proven deposits of lithium in the world</a>.</p>
<p>Almost half of the known lithium volume in the world is found in Bolivia.</p>
<p>Lithium is crucial in manufacturing batteries that are effective in electric cars.  In order to break our addiction from polluting, rapidly depleting oil, large amounts of lithium is needed.</p>
<p>Bolivia is where the lithium is located.</p>
<p>Bolivia is also on <a href="http://everydayinternationallaw.blogspot.com/2008/09/newsflash-diplomatic-strife-between-us.html">unfriendly diplomatic terms</a> with the United States.</p>
<p>Japanese and European companies are busily trying to strike deals to gain access to the lithium deposits.</p>
<blockquote><p>“We know that Bolivia can become the Saudi Arabia of lithium,” said Francisco Quisbert, 64, the leader of Frutcas, a group of salt gatherers and quinoa farmers on the edge of Salar de Uyuni, the world’s largest salt flat.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>What does this mean to the readers?</strong></p>
<p>Readers in the U.S. will see a further decline in the U.S. automotive industry &#8211; with all the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/17/news/companies/gm_showdown/index.htm">attending economic fallout</a> &#8211; as this industry cannot provide quality, electric cars.</p>
<p>Foreign automotive companies &#8211; Honda, Toyota, BMW, etc. &#8211; with access to Bolivia&#8217;s lithium reserves will trounce U.S. car companies.  They will have the cheap, electric cars that consumers will demand when oil becomes increasingly more expensive.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that the <a href="http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/110345.htm">U.S. State Department&#8217;s Krishna Urs</a> can fix this rift in diplomacy with Bolivia.<br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.joshualenon.com/">www.joshualenon.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2009/02/03/us-diplomacy-losing-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Diplomat Row Continues</title>
		<link>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2008/09/12/south-diplomat-row-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2008/09/12/south-diplomat-row-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Lenon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayinternationallaw.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times has a nice article explaining the diplomatic maneuvers between the U.S., Bolivia, &#38; Venezuela and some of it&#8217;s implications. Especially interesting is the Treasury Department accusal of Venezuelan intelligence officials of aiding Colombia&#8217;s largest rebel group &#8211; FARC. Read the article here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="ltr">The New York Times has a nice article explaining the diplomatic <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">maneuvers</span> between the U.S., Bolivia, &amp; Venezuela and some of it&#8217;s implications.</p>
<p>Especially interesting is the  Treasury Department accusal of Venezuelan intelligence officials of aiding Colombia&#8217;s largest rebel group &#8211; <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">FARC</span>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/13/world/americas/13venez.html?ex=1378958400&amp;en=5efb88f897763c04&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">Read the article here</a>.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2008/09/12/south-diplomat-row-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsflash: Diplomatic Strife between the U.S., Boliva, &amp; Venezuela!</title>
		<link>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2008/09/12/newsflash-diplomatic-strife-between-the-us-boliva-venezuela/</link>
		<comments>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2008/09/12/newsflash-diplomatic-strife-between-the-us-boliva-venezuela/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Lenon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayinternationallaw.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. and Venezuela have both declared each other&#8217;s diplomats persona non grata &#8211; which is the legal term for &#8216;get the hell out.&#8217; According to this article, this diplomatic showdown started after Bolivia asked the U.S. envoy in La Paz to leave. Bolivia accused the U.S. ambassador of instigating violent protests amongst the lower [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div dir="ltr">The U.S. and Venezuela have both declared each other&#8217;s diplomats <em>persona non grata</em> &#8211; which is the legal term for &#8216;get the hell out.&#8217;</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT01003420080912?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=topNews&amp;sp=true">this article</a>, this diplomatic showdown started after Bolivia asked the U.S. envoy in La Paz to leave.       Bolivia accused the U.S. ambassador of instigating violent protests amongst the lower class.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s the controlling international law?</strong></p>
<p>The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 controls &#8211; well &#8211; diplomatic relations.  It ensures safe passage for diplomats and their goods and codifies the inviolability of embassies and consuls.  This inviolability existed before the Convention as customary law, but controls now.</p>
<p>The U.S., and Venezuela are both <a href="http://untreaty.un.org/sample/EnglishInternetBible/partI/chapterIII/treaty3.asp">signatories</a> to the Convention.  Bolivia has <a href="http://untreaty.un.org/sample/EnglishInternetBible/partI/chapterIII/treaty3.asp">acceded </a>to the Convention.</p>
<p>Article 9 of the Convention states:</p>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">&#8220;The receiving State may at any time and without having to explain its decision, notify the sending State that the head of the mission or any member of the diplomatic staff of the mission is persona non grata or that any other member of the staff of the mission is not acceptable. In any such case, the sending State shall, as appropriate, either recall the person concerned or terminate his functions with the mission.&#8221;</div>
<p>This means that any state that may at any time may withdraw recognition of a diplomats credentials and ask them to leave the country.  There does not have to be a reason for a state to do this.</p>
<p>Expelling diplomats is a move often used in brinkmanship between countries.</p>
<p><strong>What does this mean to you?</strong></p>
<p>The expulsion of diplomats is hardly a reason to panic.  Theoretically, new diplomats could be sent to replace the ones expelled.  No country appears to have severed all diplomatic relations.</p>
<p>Still, such brinkmanship from South American countries is troubling.  The U.S. relationship with many countries south of its border have become tense.  Decades of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_drugs#United_States_foreign_policy">intrusive narcotic policies</a>, support for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilean_Coup_of_1973">toppling</a> local <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_contra">governments</a>, and rising rhetoric by the U.S. towards South America has created an increasing sense of mistrust.</p>
<p>The implications from this is that the U.S. will find itself increasingly unable to influence policy in this area.  From drug trafficking to mining and oil sales, South American countries may find reasons to go against the interests of the U.S.  If only out of spite for decades of ill treatment.</p>
<p>As world politics shift to accommodate the rising economic might of China &amp; Russia, the U.S. should be seeking to strengthen relationships, especially with it&#8217;s neighbors.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://everydayinternationallaw.com/2008/09/12/newsflash-diplomatic-strife-between-the-us-boliva-venezuela/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

